I think there are a lot of distinctions one can draw—for example a lot of math is more “theory-building” than “problem-solving,” and we’ve see relatively little progress there. Not saying it won’t happen, just that it hasn’t happened yet.
Part of the disconnect between the rhetoric here and the reality (and why I complain so much) is that most math research doesn’t look like “solve this rigorously stated problem.” Of course tools that can do so would be immensely useful, but it’s a pretty small part of the job.