Daniel Litt on X: “I think there are a lot of distinctions one can draw—for example a lot…”

A fast, private reader for public X posts. No account, no tracking, no pop-ups.

PeekX is an independent tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by X Corp. “X” and “Twitter” are trademarks of their respective owners. We only show posts that their authors made public and never access private or protected accounts. Downloaded media belongs to its creators — please respect their rights.

Daniel Litt on X: “I think there are a lot of distinctions one can draw—for example a lot…” | PeekX

Username or post link

Home / @littmath / Post

will depue

@willdepue

May 2

very interested how you divide the kinds of math and how the skills needed to succeed differ?

just guessing:

id naturally assume due to RL that math tasks fall on spectrum of verifiability and that has & will directly translate to models’ relative performance on such

i’d also

1 0 19

Daniel Litt

@littmath

Replying to @willdepue

I think there are a lot of distinctions one can draw—for example a lot of math is more “theory-building” than “problem-solving,” and we’ve see relatively little progress there. Not saying it won’t happen, just that it hasn’t happened yet.

May 2, 2026, 4:23 PM UTC

1 67

Downloads

This post has no photos or videos. You can still save it as an image or copy its text below.

Save & share

Turn this post into a clean image, or copy it as text or Markdown.

Open on X