Séb Krier on X: “I agree that verbal probability terms are inherently too elastic to ca…”

A fast, private reader for public X posts. No account, no tracking, no pop-ups.

PeekX is an independent tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by X Corp. “X” and “Twitter” are trademarks of their respective owners. We only show posts that their authors made public and never access private or protected accounts. Downloaded media belongs to its creators — please respect their rights.

Username or post link

Home / @sebkrier / Post

Tyler John

@tyler_m_john

Apr 20

@sebkrier @itaisher fight me ❤️

2 0 8

Séb Krier

@sebkrier

Replying to @tyler_m_john

I agree that verbal probability terms are inherently too elastic to carry calibrated meaning on their own, but I think this isn't exactly my concern here. My issue isn't with "using numbers in general" but how this is ultimately used, where, and and what for.

In the case of

ideas.repec.orgThe interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world,

Apr 21, 2026, 12:57 AM UTC

4 95

Downloads

This post has no photos or videos. You can still save it as an image or copy its text below.

Save & share

Turn this post into a clean image, or copy it as text or Markdown.

Open on X

Séb Krier on X: “I agree that verbal probability terms are inherently too elastic to ca…” | PeekX