Erick Ybarra
@ErickYbarra3
Appreciate the pushback. And I understand your point.
We should be cautious about the term "canon" because this can, for some authors, include both unquestionable and questionable books/contents. We see this as far back as Origen, but reported more profusely by Eusebius of
We should be cautious about the term "canon" because this can, for some authors, include both unquestionable and questionable books/contents. We see this as far back as Origen, but reported more profusely by Eusebius of
Ecclesia Antiqua@EcclesiaAntiqua · Oct 7In his latest video, @Trent_Horn says that Luther "did not try to remove James from the Bible," and advises that they stop saying so. This is incorrect, and Catholics may continue to say so.
Luther repeatedly affirmed that James was not apostolic and conflicted with Scripture.
Open quoted post →Luther repeatedly affirmed that James was not apostolic and conflicted with Scripture.
3 30